Follow a finding
Choose a statement in the analysis. Follow its reference and check whether the original supports it.
Work
Examine the answer and the work behind it
Read the work before discussing a project. Two fourteen-page specimens examine a legal record and medical trial evidence. A separate five-page sample shows how selected guidance can become an explanation and appointment worksheet. Each document links to its sources and states its limits.
Real work · Public record only · No client involved01
Legal record analysis
Purpose and fair use
The analysis distinguishes the Court’s holding from its reasoning and records the questions left open. A chronology and proposition matrix connect the discussion to official sources.
Fourteen pages · Not legal adviceExamine the legal specimen 02Medical evidence map
Three aspirin trials
ARRIVE, ASCEND and ASPREE are compared by population and outcome. Event rates remain beside bleeding findings, with later follow-up and the limits of comparison identified.
Fourteen pages · Not medical adviceExamine the medical specimenResearch communication
Kidney results: a record for your next appointment
A five-page educational example with plain-language explanations, printable records and questions for a care team. Four institutional sources are linked inside the document.
Not clinically reviewed. Not medical advice.
How to inspect it
What to look for in the documents
Separate the voices
Look for the distinction between what a source reports and what Atlas infers from it.
Read the qualifications
Check what remains unresolved and what falls outside the document’s stated scope.
Test the structure
Use a chronology or comparison table to find the source behind an entry. Consider whether that format would help with your own record.
A map of the published specimen
Find the connection you need to check
Use a research map to brief someone who has not read the full record. They can follow a question to the relevant finding, then open its source. This example maps the Warhol v. Goldsmith specimen. Select a point to inspect the connection.
Which use was reviewed?
The appeal addressed the first fair use factor for AWF’s 2016 license of Orange Prince to Condé Nast. The research question must identify that use before comparing the records.
Connection: Compare the earlier event with the challenged event.
Public-record example. No client involved. Educational research, not legal advice. The map summarizes selected passages of the 2023 opinion; it is not a current review of the law.
Read the map as text
- Question: Which use was reviewed?. The appeal addressed the first fair use factor for AWF’s 2016 license of Orange Prince to Condé Nast. The research question must identify that use before comparing the records. Connection: Compare the earlier event with the challenged event.
- Earlier event: 1984 reference license. Goldsmith licensed her photograph to Vanity Fair as a reference for an illustration. The opinion records a $400 payment and source credit. Connection: Supplies the earlier side of the comparison.
- Challenged event: 2016 magazine license. Condé Nast paid the Andy Warhol Foundation $10,000 to license Orange Prince for a magazine cover. This was the transaction examined by the Court. Connection: Supplies the later side and identifies the challenged use.
- Comparison: Two separate events. The specimen compares the licensing events in separate columns. Different images and recipients of payment should not disappear into a single description of Warhol’s work. Connection: Provides context for the question before the Court.
- Decision: The first fair use factor. The Court concluded that the first factor favored Goldsmith for the challenged license. This point links the answer to the question the Court actually considered. Connection: Answers the defined question, subject to the stated limit.
- Limit: Other uses left open. The Court expressly left the creation, display and sale of the original Prince Series works outside this analysis. The map preserves that boundary rather than extending the answer to other uses. Connection: Prevents the decision from becoming a claim about every use.
Discuss a project
Would this approach suit your project?
Describe the question and the result you need. Atlas will identify the proposed scope and format, with the fee and timing, before work begins.
Discuss a project